Instead of trying to find the truth of the physical universe
on its fundamental operating principles by the method of deduction completely modeled
from the material physical standpoint, where the speed of light is the maximum
speed of travel for any existing objects, I would like to use the method of
intuition to describe the universe and then will try to find any flaws in such
a model using the existing contemporary mathematical description of the
universe.
If there are no flaws but a great reduction of mysteries and inconsistencies, the new doctrine/paradigm may as well be the truth.
If there are no flaws but a great reduction of mysteries and inconsistencies, the new doctrine/paradigm may as well be the truth.
The universe is filled with the superluminal particles that
travel always faster than the speed of light. Like the air molecules inside a
balloon, the multitudes of this superluminal gas defines the volume in the
three dimensional universe. Although not visible, the presence of the air is
manifested by the volume defined by the pressurized gas inside the balloon.
Like wise, although not visible, the presence of these superluminal particles
is manifested by the presence of the very space in the universe. The three
dimensional space is a confined surface in the four dimensional sphere. The
lowest speed that these particles can travel is the speed of light. These
particles have energy and momentum but the mass is imaginary. The physical
measurement of their mass is possible by its squared form which is essentially
a negative number. As such, one may say that it’s not a physical particle because
it doesn’t have the real mass as if trying to justify and support the
conclusion that they can not exist. But in a fair physical sense, it is still a
physical particle because it has momentum and energy; therefore, the
possibility of its existence can not be dismissed. In other words, they are
still physical particles. They may not be visible or physically testable like
the trajectory of electrons using its bending effect from the magnets but their
existence can not be disputed.
These superluminal particles are magnetic monopoles. Our universe
happened to be populated by one type of magnetic poles as the majority
occupants. It still doesn’t exclude the possibility that the other magnetic
monopoles can exists in small numbers. It’s only a matter of number that this
universe happened to be populated by one type of magnetic monopoles as a
majority. The mirror imaged universe may exist where the other type of
monopoles dominate such a universe. The electron and proton will have opposite
electric charges in such a universe. So, in such a way, the entire symmetry of
the dual universe is preserved.
The duality in the theory of electricity and magnetism between
the phenomenon of electricity and magnetism dictates that the superluminal
magnetic monopoles will produce spiral electric field along its passage. The
random gas like motion of these superluminal magnetic monopole particles
creates an electromagnetic bubble like soup in the space. Due to the randomness
of these superluminal particles, the time averaged electric field in any space
will be zero but in the microscopic point of view this will not be the case.
Each and every point in space has a randomly fluctuating electric field where
the time averaged electric field strength will be zero. This electromagnetic
bubble soup is the medium that mediates the propagation of the electromagnetic
waves in space.
This microscopic electromagnetic bubble soup is also the
cause of the quantum mechanical behavior of the charged particles. The motion
of an electron placed in this bubble soup will be random and unpredictable. Its
probability of existence at the same original position will decrease exponentially
in time. The Plank constant h is a function of the number density of these
super luminal particles, their average speed and the strength of the individual
monopole magnet.
These superluminal magnetic monopole particles interact
kinematically like billiard balls with the matter particles like protons and
neutrons giving off momentum and energy or absorbing them at the same time.
This interaction produces the effect of gravity in space.
Now these superluminal magnetic monopole gases in the
universe have to be the neutrinos. The number of neutrinos in the universe has
to be the same as the number of protons and electrons if we assume that they
can be produced only through the process of the beta decay. The abundance of these
superluminal particles is explained as being natural.
Also, it has been a logical curiosity in the theory of
electricity and magnetism, why there are no separate single magnets in the
universe. Why does the magnetism always appear in pair? This question is also solved
by this intuitive picture of the universe.
Method of deductive logic will never allow us to reach this
point of conclusion because the speed of light as the ultimate limit of speed
of travel for any kind of physical particles immediately prohibits such a leap
of faith.
For a physical wave to propagate it needs a medium that
supports the travel of that specific wave, then, what is the physical medium
that supports the propagation of light and where are they and what are they
composed of? Just the same way the pressurized air molecule is the medium that
supports the propagation of the sound waves; the pressurized superluminal
neutrino particles are the medium that supports the propagation of the
electromagnetic wave through the electromagnetic bubble soup created by their
motion..
These questions have already been answered as well. Needless
to say, the perennial question of where are all the neutrinos that have been produced
by the beta decays in the past has also been answered.
Can there be a vacuum that these tachyonic superluminal
particles can not reach? The ultimate vacuum state will be relative in the
sense that where in space the material density is so high that the neutrinos
can not penetrate, and it depends on the density and size of the object, it
will virtually create the vacuum state of these particles. In return, these
extreme dense spot in space will be the strong gravitational center. For
example, a black hole will be such a localized place in space that creates a
vacuum of superluminal neutrinos.
By creating a continuous tachyonic vacuum in the front of an
object by mechanical or electronic means, this technology can also be used as
the driving mechanism of the reactionless propulsion method which can also be
faster than the speed of light.
These superluminal particles are certainly physical
particles, but they can not be categorized as material particles. But then the
photons are not material particles either if anyone tries to challenge the
legitimacy of the existence of such particles just based on the materialistic
property.
The Einstein’s quadratic structure of the mass energy
equation has already suggested the mathematical possibility of the existence of
the particles that may have imaginary mass. This quadratic structure is at the
basis of the Lorentz transformation in the high energy particle physics. This
means that the superluminal tachyons do not violate the symmetry of the Lorentz
transformation from the start.
Whatever is allowed in mathematical equations tends to
manifest in reality. This was the case with dipole gravity which was discarded
as meaningless in the solution of the linearized form of general relativity. It
turned out to be meaningful as well as soon as you clarify what is the physically
meaningful displacement of the center of mass. This could not have been
anticipated within the doctrine of Newtonian mechanics because such kind of a shift
in the center of mass can not simply exist in Newtonian dynamics.
Whenever the science needs a leap forward, the existing
paradigm tends to block and prohibit such a jump because the old doctrine can
not encompass the new paradigm. On the other hand, the new doctrine can encompass
the old one plus it provides new physical insights in many unexplained physical
phenomena that have existed in the past.
I just found your site today. I'm intrigued by some of your ideas. I wonder if you've considered publishing at Progress in Physics Journal? I'm sure many there would welcome you. http://www.ptep-online.com/index.html
ReplyDelete