Simplicity of the Mechanics of the Universe

I believe the general mechanics of the universe is wonderfully simple. God created the universe in a most efficient way possible. While the symmetry of the nature can be traced to the ultimate level, the way the symmetry is broken in the details of the mechanics of the universe is profoundly mysterious and fruitful when it is found.

In fact, it must be noted that the most of the secret of the universe is hidden in the manner the various symmetries of the universe are broken. What we have believed to be an ultimate truth turns out to be a partial picture of the entire universe because of the way the specific symmetry is broken. For an example, while the speed of light is the ultimate speed that can be reached by the material body in Newtonian physics as was faithfully adopted by Einstein, there was no mention of the possible existence of the tachyonic particles.

Within the conventional paradigm, all the physics described by Newtonian mechanics is correct. However, as soon as we cross over to relativity, which originally conformed to the notion of Newtonian mechanics as an approximation for the case of the slow motion of the particles compared to the speed of light, it must be noted that the quadratic nature of the mass and momentum relation enters into the equation. While not many people in the field have suspected in the early days, there were researchers like E.C.G. Sudarshan and others who proposed the notion that there may be particles traveling faster than the speed of light. This notion, while plausible, did not attract much attention.

The fascinating aspect of this conjecture is that the quadratic nature of the Einstein's mass momentum relations did not absolutely excluded the possibility of the existence of the faster than the speed of light particles. Now the question is which known particle can be a candidate for this particle. In this respect, the field of experimental particle physics has been struggling to measure the mass of the neutrinos for decades and in most of the well known experiments, the results were leaning toward the negative mass squared value of the neutrinos which means that the neutrinos can be tachyons. Even the visual(light) detection of the 1987 Supernova was preceded by the detection of the burst of the high energy neutrinos at least by a day.

In the manner of the book keeping of the particles known in the universe, the neutron decays always with an emission of a neutrino, as a form of a mysteriously missing momentum, and into an electron and a proton as a by product of the beta decay. If the neutrinos have real mass, they can not travel faster than the speed of light and they should gravitate toward heavy massive sources of gravity. But we do not have evidences for this. As a matter of fact, we have no book keeping for these massive number of neutrinos in the universe. If they can be counted, the number of the neutrinos in the universes will be the same as the number of the electrons in the universe.

Conventional wisdom tells us that we do not know where they are and what they do and we simply do not care.

I mentioned above about the book keeping of the particles in the universe. If a financial accountant has done the auditing of the present day particle physics for the inventory, he/she would be frowning upon the apparent deficiency of the knowledge of the whereabouts of the neutrinos. The energy and the momentum they carry away from the beta decay simply have disappeared from the scene and no one seems to be bothered by the very fact. If our three dimensional space is a closed surface of the four dimensional space, the neutrinos, if they are tachyons, can not escape the spatial universe and they should be with us every moment of our lives.

In fact, they are the masters of the universe and we(all the material objects) are just transients, as the matters come and go and form many different shapes and colors. Neutrinos dictate matters to gravitate and carry all the electromagnetic waves for our daily communications, including the visible lights for us to see and observe. We can not imagine the universe without the neutrinos. They are like air molecules we breath everyday but we rarely contemplate their benefit in our daily lives.

We now travel in our air space using the aerodynamical principles. In the future, we will be traveling the unviverse using the tachyonic principles of the neutrinos.

The space is filled with tachyonic neutrinos and the future of our civilization, if there is any such thing as the future of our civilization, depends on how we develop this technology and use it for the benefit of our future generation.

Black Holes, Worm Holes and Dipole Gravity

In general, a rotating massive stellar object does not remain a spherical form. So the solution derived from the Schwarzschild metric can not work for the rapidly rotating black holes at the core of the galaxies. In this sense, the general discussions about the event horizon in various shapes of the black holes is questionable and at most philosophical.

In general, the shapes of the rotating stellar object would be gradually changing its profile into a double conic structure as the rotational speed develops faster and faster. This also raises the question of the efficacy of the conventional approach of finding a suitable metric for general relativity is at all meaningful, because for a given metric, the form of the source is supposed to remain fixed.

While there will be lingering questions about the covariance of dipole gravity, once the point of view is changed into the fact that Newtonian gravity is not covariant by itself, yet it provided answers to the dominant questions regarding the planetary structure formation, the application of dipole gravity in the real universe will become the most exciting field of physics in the future.

In retrospect, the known general relativity didn't provide answers to the mechanics of the rotating massive stars which is directly related to the jets and the dark matter problems and their related structures. Instead, they have spent enormous amount of time on the subject of the time machine and wormhole which will turn out to be fairly impractical from the view point of dipole gravity, and the black holes. The readers should be able to see the large pictures of the areas of the subject that the known general relativity has been covering and didn't cover.

Only when people realize what they have been missing, there emerges a large picture. If you are in the woods, very often than not, the forest looks like it is all made of pines.

The subject of the black holes and others that have been popularized to the general public in the past, has been presented in the context of the serious flawed assumption that there is no dipole gravity. In fact, all of those theories will have to be reviewed within the new light of dipole gravity. Some will remain valid, while a lot of others will have to be trashed.

So, the readers should learn the seriousness of the situation what it means to incorporate dipole gravity in the present day physics and why it is such a formidable threat to the establishment in such way that they have to resist the public recognition of it by all means.

It may have worked in the ancient times, when the field was narrowly focused and few people were engaged in the practice of the specific field of science. I seriously do not think that it will work in the present time. The fields are much more diverse and they are all related. Some people in the field will resent the fact that they were not informed of the serious new development early enough so that they didn't have to waste their time on the unnecessary adventures.

As Plato elaborated in his book "Republic", the mode of the defeat of an evil is that the evil can not stand by itself because it sparks discomfort within. The collapse of an Empire starts from the lies, the injustices and the corruption within itself, not from the outside.

Water Vapors Found in Black Hole Jet Emissions

"A US-European astronomy team has recently announced at the European Week of Astronomy and Space Science meeting that it has discovered water spewing out of a black hole, at the center of a galaxy located billions of light-years away. The radio wavelength emissions that were observed in 2007 with the 100-meter German Effelsberg radio telescope and the Expanded Very Large Array showed a galaxy that emitted water from its core about 2.5 billion years after the Universe exploded into existence.

This means that the formation, which took all these billions of years to get its light from its location to us, was among the first generations of galaxies to be formed. Its water signature was detected as a wavelength marker. Each type of substance has a unique fingerprint on that scale, and water makes no difference. Scientists say that this discovery is very peculiar, and that extensive studies and new theories are needed to explain this phenomenon." quoted from softpedia.

It would be awfully redundant to mention at this point that the Blanford-Znajek process is disappointingly inadequate to explain this water vapor jet phenomenon. The ejected material would be pretty much the combination of lava and steam as in the typical volcanoes on earth. This experimental report is an another supporting evidence in favor of dipole gravity. This is also the second blow to the Blanford-Znajek theory since the astronomers have announced that neutron stars also emit jets.

Scientific Activity Halted

If you are a keen observer to the science news, you will notice that the scientific community especially in the field of astrophysics is in a total suspension mode at the moment. No more talks or discussions about MOND or dark matter problems or the black hole jets for that matter.

Anyone in the field of cosmology or astrophysics can tell easily what is the meaning of dipole gravity when it is explained to such a pedagogical degree in the dipole gravity blog. Even if they may not tell you what they think in detail, the sudden halt of the news in the field tells you more than what they may want to tell you in public. They want to have a silent exit from their failed research activity.

Although the CDM proponents have little to correct in their model, the fine tuning problems may be solved by incorporating dipole gravity. In fact, they should be able to predict the mass, the shape and the rotating speed of the galactic cores using the dipole gravity model to a great precision. I would not suggest the professionals in the field to start with dipole gravity if they are a couple of years away from their retirement. It would be meaningless for them to start a totally new field of research in such a short period of time, but if he/she is many years away from the retirement, it would be wise to jump onto the bandwagon of dipole gravity as quickly as possible.

First of all, you don't want your students to learn the subjects that no one will be interested in the future. Your students need to teach their future students the subjects that will last long(at least for hundreds of years if not for millennia) once they become professors in the field. It needs to be emphasized that this is the beginning of a whole new chain of the teaching activity that will affect our future civilization.

Wise decisions need to be made for the benefit of the future of mankind. In my suggestion, let one of the students to go through the details of the calculations in the paper and make sure everything is correct. Then, there is nothing for you to look back.

Basically, it is the general form of the second order gravity next to Newtonian predicted by general relativity. It is completely general for a rotating object large or small to the size of a molecular level. The geometrical shape of the object is critical to the inherent physics. The known general relativity didn't provide answers to the rotating stellar objects, but we now have the solution with dipole gravity.

If you don't have a confidence about it, you can build one by verifying all the details of the calculations in the paper by yourself. I'm sure the member of the editors in the journal Physica Scripta has done more than enough of the proof.

I can't wait until someone publish a paper describing how the Saturn like form of the planet can be developed using dipole gravity. The Saturn's polar holes and the rings are the perfect examples that dipole gravity can handle easily.

Did Einstein Miss Dipole Gravity in His Own Theory?

The brutally honest answer to this question is yes. But it was in the early 1920s and the observational astronomy hasn't yet discovered the jets nor the dark matter problem at the time. Like in many cases when a new theory is proposed, the author of the new theory will be very anxious to establish a strong footing of the new theory based on the existing principles or dogma that have been popularly known.

Violation of the well known principles will easily be considered a sign of the failure of a new theory. The only way to achieve this goal is to anchor the theory to those well known results within the established scientific field. Of course, one of this anchors in Einstein's case had to be Newtonian gravity which is very obvious and justifiably a necessary anchor to claim the validity of the new theory of gravity.

And the next one in Einstein's mind was Mach's principle. The existence of the centrifugal force like term in the second order of the weak field limit in the linearized theory of general relativity proved without a shadow of doubt that general relativity was the correct theory in Einstein's view. The claim of these two anchors could not be challenged without challenging Einstein's own authority. If anyone decided to challenge his interpretation, he/she has to have extraordinary physical as well as theoretical evidence to prove it.

So, I don't think it is entirely fair to blame the group that has been so profoundly successful in developing the theory to its present form for missing the solution of dipole gravity. This shows the remarkable example that the ultimate teacher of the secret of the universe is the nature itself not a fallible human. However, the action after the key point of dipole gravity is revealed is a separate issue. They should have done everything that is possible to disseminate the knowledge to the people in the field so that the theory of dipole gravity can be utilized for studying the various mysteries of the universe. The only reason this knowledge is being suppressed is the jealousy that is the source of all evils.

Even in the early days of general relativity, the mysterious axial term(in the direction of the Z axis) of the Lense-Thirring force, which has nothing to do with the centrifugal force, bothered both Lense and Einstein as we can see in their personal communications, because this axial force term could not be eliminated in the process of deriving the "centrifugal force". In a way, this could and should have raised enough suspicion on the validity of the centrifugal force interpretation of the second order terms.

What I believed and wondered in 1981, when I was at the graduate school of the University of Michigan learning theoretical particle physics, was that general relativity should be able to explain the jet phenomenon and if not, why not and why the electromagnetism has to be used for it. It was a legitimate question but I didn't have a clue. I didn't trust the theory saying that the plasma and the magnetic field are the causes of the jets. Black holes by definition should collapse all the electromagnetic fields in the surrounding area. I thought it was too bulky and cumbersome and personally could not eliminate the feeling of the ad hocishness of the theory which is now known as the Blanford-Znajek process, no matter how the people in the field may be excited about it.

It was only in 1995 when I noticed the abnormalities of the center of mass of the rotating hemisphere when considered with special relativity and Newtonian mechanics and the rest is history. I can only credit it to God's intervention.

Being a human being, I made a mistake of anchoring dipole gravity to the centrifugal force interpretation of the Lense-Thirring force as shown in the paper published in 1999. Otherwise, the paper even may not have had a chance to be published anyway. Basically, this interpretation hindered the connection of dipole gravity to the dark matter problem for the next 9 years. As stated in the previous posts, the signs of the Lense-Thirring force was wrong and reversed. Only this new interpretation can explain the jets and the dark matter problem consistently within the general relativistic principles.

How and Why?

Once you get to know what dipole gravity really is, you will experience the realization that the seemingly benign mathematical "trick" and a sensible logic becomes bigger and bigger until it overwhelms your entire knowledge of general relativity and the cosmology and come to the realization that how tiny all other adventures in general relativity have been.

See how many years the people in the field have been fallen into believing that the modified Maxwell's equation is the genuine part of general relativity which is also conventionally known as gravitomagnetism while it is far from the true general relativity. How many texts are written around this subject for so long as if it is the real thing? You will experience the tremendous sense of despair and helplessness because of the very realization that you are witnessing the deepest missing link of the mystery that has been eluding our science for so long. And also by the brutal awakening that how simple it was, when someone showed it exactly how it was

See how long it has been believed that general relativity has no answer for the large scale universe. .See also how long people in the field have suffered because of the lack of answer for the jets and the dark matter problems directly from general relativity.

In ancient Korea, when the scholars experienced this kind of upheaval in the high office of the academia or in the government, they simply went to the high mountain, shaved their hair and became Buddhist monks. The world in their minds has become meaningless because they suddenly have come to the realization that what they have built in their entire life has become a pile of manure.

It seems like I have given them the hardest blow that they have ever experienced in their entire life of academic career. But whatever that can fall will eventually fall because it is not built on the rock.

I understand the unresponsiveness. Because there is nothing to rebuttal.

I think many of the scholars in academia would have taken that path if this happened in ancient Korea. The whole life has lost its meaning in their minds.

I think it is time to wake up from the coma. What you are witnessing is the reality.

For those who believe in the time machine, here is an example of what its claim surmounts to. I made an apple juice out of a batch of apples. And now the juice is inside a several gallon sized bottles. Going backward time means that this juice suddenly comes out of the bottles by themselves and collects all the pieces of the apple bits and the liquid and form back to a complete batch of the apples that I originally started.

If you think this is possible, then it is ok to believe in the time machine. The entropy of a system is known to increase in any known physical experiment and this principle has never been violated in the universe. To claim that there can exist a physical time machine, you have to prove how the principle of the entropy increase is violated in a theory that is remotely plausible. There is no known physical event that requires the entropy principle has to be violated. There may be still unknown theory beyond general relativity that makes the entropy principle to be violated but, at least, general relativity dipole gravity from has already proved that the two way traversable wormhole is impossible.

On the other hand, one can argue that the theory of dipole gravity violates the energy conservation principle, but general relativity has never been proven to conserve energy in a local system. One can also argue that the theory of dipole gravity violates the Newtonian mechanics. If you insist the totality of Newtonian mechanics, then you can not explain the dark matter problem. General relativity is clearly shown to violate Newtonian mechanics from the example of dipole gravity and the simplicity of explaining the cosmological problem using the very principle.

Cosmic Battle Field

After all, Fritz Zwicky was right. There IS dark matter in the universe. The Lamda CDM model has been vindicated, while the MOND suffered a blow in this cosmic saga of the dark matter battle field. Except that there is no need for the presence of the exotic particles to explain the dark matter’s identity, most of the results of the CDM model should be valid without a major revision.

So, the LHC can relax from the pressure of the expectation of the detection of the exotic particles called WIMPs. At least for now it seems that the detection of the WIMPs is irrelevant to the success of the CDM model. Of course, even if the WIMP may be detected from LHC, there is no reason they should be populated in such a density around the core of the galaxies that the debate will not be over without an additional physics.

“Moreover, ΛCDM says nothing about the fundamental physical origin of dark matter, dark energy and the nearly scale-invariant spectrum of primordial curvature perturbations: in that sense, it is merely a useful parameterization of ignorance.” quoted from Wiki.

Now, what will be the real identity of the dark matter? Will they look like sands, ice, rocks or rocks of the size of the boulders? If we look at the volcanoes that erupt on earth, it will be pretty much the same as the jets from the rotating galactic cores except that the strong repulsive gravity at the poles will send them very far away (light years) than the usual pressure powered eruption of the volcanoes on earth.

Normally, the faster the expansion of the pressure as they come out of the nozzle, the finer the size of the particles and also the faster the rate of the condensation. But then the port of the rotating core of the galaxies may not be small whatever the meaning of the "small" in this case may be. So, one can expect that the rocks ejected from the rotating star could easily be the size of the boulders if not the size of the typical asteroids.