Cult Science

Cult is a form of a religion that has a set of rules that can not be challenged regardless of its accuracy or scientific proof of falsehood. I noticed that there is a scientific cult if the term makes any sense because science should mean everything against cult. But our modern society does have several of scientific cultist beliefs. As I proved recently in the publication "Re-Examination of Energy Conservation Principle in Charged Capacitors and the Reported Anomalous Energy Devices", local energy conservation law is a myth that is not true at all. It has been almost 270 years since electricity was discovered by Benjamin Franklin in 1750s. The continually developed theory of Electricity and Magnetism since then solidified the concept that energy can not be created out of nothing. It was in 1999, it could be June or July, when I was working at the Wright Patterson Air Force Base at AFIT(Air Force Institute of Technology) in Dayton Ohio as a research scientist in the field of solid state physics experiment. I noticed that there were many reports of free energy devices using magnets in many different ways and I was curious if there is any way the same phenomenon can be found in electrostatics. While walking after dinner time in the suburb of Dayton Ohio in beautiful summer weather, I noticed that the repulsive potential energy in a spherical capacitor was not included in the total energy calculation of the stored energy in capacitors. The two energies between the attractive and repulsive potential energy can not be mixed or missed one over the other. The mistake is apparently clear as a bright day of the summer. 

It gave me something to think about beyond the regular day job of solid state physics experiment. The more I delve into the subject to find where I could be wrong, the more clear that the gargantuan institutional mistake is apparent. Basically what I found was the fact that the modern science is based on cultist belief. This is not going to be an easy job to fix considering the massive flow of civilization firmly based on the concept of limited source of energy. But I'm not a kind of guy to forget or give up on something this huge. 

Prior to this incident, in 1995, as I detailed in my book "Physics of the New Millennium, Birth of the New Paradigm", I found the anomaly in the classical mechanics on the subject matter of center of mass. When special relativity is employed, I noticed that the rotating hemisphere develops an interesting phenomenon of shifting its center of mass which is unexpected and unusual because center of mass can change only if there is an external force acting up on the object according to the sacred classical mechanics. When the rotating hemispherical system was investigated in the light of general relativity, I found that it is the second term in the linearized theory of general relativity. This second term has been known to have no physical meaning for almost a century. I calculated the potential created by this term in the oppositely superposed system of a rotating sphere. Viola !!! I found the term in the limit of small distance r, it has exactly of the same form as the previously calculated Lense-Thirring force except the sign. The meaning of this term is the discovery of the enigmatic force that propel object without external force. So called the conceptual "inertial propulsion method" has been discovered. 

The paper was published in the Swedish Physics Journal Phsica Scripta in 1999 about the same time I  noticed that the repulsive electrostatic potential energy is missing in the conventional calculation of the stored energy in charged capacitors. The fundamental and shocking revelation of the paper was that the second order term in the linearized theory of general relativity is not meaningless. It has amazing full meaning. After all, it is a new fundamental force of nature called dynamic dipole gravity. 

After a while it became obvious that the sign of the Lense-Thirring force was fundamentally wrong. When a sphere starts to rotate, the total energy of the sphere in dynamic motion would increase the effective gravity due to the increase of kinetic energy (which is equal to additional mass). On the other hand, the concept of centrifugal force makes the force at the surface of the equatorial plane to be repulsive. The previous researchers have already did the work eventually questioning the validity of the concept of centrifugal force being assigned to Lense-Thirring force. The obvious red flag is in the fact that Lense-Thirring force has the z axial component of force that comes out in conjunction with the radial force. Once the radial component of Lense-Thirring force is interpreted as centrifugal force, the z component of force has no place to go. What this essentially means is that the centrifugal force interpretation originally proposed by Einstein was fundamentally flawed. I have no information if Lense-Thirring had any qualm on the idea of assigning the radial component of the force they derived as centrifugal force or not before publishing their paper. 

So the saga continued until I decided that the paper published in 1999 needs a revision. A minor one in a way but then also could be a major one because the signs of the Lense-Thirring force have to be reversed. I couldn't let the obvious mistake in fundamental physics remain unfixed. That would be a cardinal sin as a physicist who has devoted his life to find the truth in the universe of the nature. 

The process was arduous, you have to find reasons why you went along with the signs of Lense-Thirring force that has suspicion in it in the first paper and why you decided to change it afterwards. The reason was simple, I believed I could be wrong in challenging the sign of the long time published papers and endorsed by Einstein. Since the concept of the dynamics shift of the center of mass due to special relativity reproduced Lense-Thirring force within a factor of 4/15 except the sign, there was no reason to suspect that special relativistic dynamic center of mass shift approach is the right passage way to find something new. 

The key was in the recognition that once the sign of the Lense-Thirring force is reversed, it starts to explain multitude of cosmological mysteries that has not been possible. The main thing was the blackhole jets. There is no problem explaining the blackhole jets once the sign of Lense-Thirring force is reversed. In addition, the thin rings of Saturn is a matter of fact within the concept of dipole gravity. In reality, it is a universal fact when a planet rotates fast, it creates rings around it. 

These two factual findings on dipole gravity and missing repulsive electrostatic potential energy in charged capacitors were the reason I decided to write the book "Physics of the New Millennium, Birth of the New Paradigm", in case anyone would want to argue the motivation as vanity. 

Modern scientific community is indulged in a scientific cult. Fatally wrong concepts are running wild in the field of science as if it is correct. And there are unbelievably strong resistance against to change it. 

I was flabbergasted when the BA degree administrator in arXiv threatened me that they are going to ban me from uploading papers in arXiv if I insist on uploading the sign corrected paper on dipole gravity. They insist that the two papers are the same. Of course the two papers are not the same. The signs of Lense-Thirring force were wrong and they need to be changed. Otherwise, there will be no progress of science in our civilization. 

The reason is because this paper is the beginning of the theoretical and observational verification of the existence of Non-Newtonian gravity force in the universe, which will eventually provide us with the non-rocket propulsion method to travel the universe to other galaxies.