Tachyonic Kinematics

A little bit of investigation of the kinetic interaction of the tachyonic particles with the ordinary matter particles shows the interesting behavior of the tachyons. The fundamental principle in the kinematics of physics is the energy-momentum conservation. In this equations, it can be shown that as the tachyons lose energy, they travel faster in complete opposite of the behavior of the ordinary particles. As the ordinary matter particles tend to stay in the state of rest as they lose all of their kinetic energy, the tachyons prefer to stay in the highest speed as possible. One can conjecture that it could be the infinite speed, however, this is not realistic, so we may contend that it will become as close to infinity.

If there is such a thing as the instant communication between the two separate spatial locations in the universe, this must be it.

If the advanced civilizations have mastered this technology, the efforts of the SETI would be fruitless because the electromagnetic radio wave would be the most inefficient method of communication in the universe.

The ripple through the fabric of the universe happens because of the tendency of the these tachyonic neutrinos to be stabilized in terms of their density and population. One may wonder how the advanced civilizations in the universe are able to detect the abnormal generation of the neutrinos at the far corners of the universe. This suggests that the fabric of the universe can be disturbed by the unusual massive generation of the beta decay where the abundant neutrinos are produced. In terms of the mundane word, this means the chain reaction of the fissionable atomic material which would be totally unnatural in terms of the spontaneous flow of the cosmic event, which could easily arouse the curiosity and attention by the extra terrestrial civilization if they exist.

It seems to me the number of the tachyons also determines the volume of the universe itself just like the number of the air molecules inside a balloon determines the size of the balloon itself. If the black holes can absorb some of these tachyonic neutrinos, they will certainly contribute to the shrinkage of the universe. In the four dimensional universe, the three dimensional space is contained but it certainly would be perceived as infinite by the three dimensional entities.

Interesting Comment of Nikola Tesla and Dipole Gravity

"Today's scientist have substituted mathematics for experiments and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."

Nikola Tesla

I found the above quote of Nikola Tesla from the web site of John Bedini who is the electronics genius of today. The correctness of the source is as good as that of John Bedini's. But I think it makes sense that the above statements could have been made by Nikola Tesla. He could be referring to Einstein's general relativity and also many of the Thermodynamical equations which may have been considered a symptom of "wandering off" from the reality in Tesla's point of view. My personal take on this is that the statement of Nikola Tesla can be a perfect description for the presently known theory of quantum gravity. For example, the theory of Quantum gravity could not find dipole gravity which is a macroscopic phenomenon.

The scope of quantum gravity is pretty much the same as general relativity. The fundamental question of "if gravity is a quantum phenomenon" has not even been settled yet. It is still in the domain of a conjecture. The obvious attempt to incorporate the gravity into quantum theory has failed in the first step when they couldn't find a method to renormalize it, which is a critical step to make any sense out of a quantum theory because the infinities in the quantum field theory are formidable beasts that need to be regulated with a systematic subtraction. They haven't found a method to regulate quantum gravity to make the prediction of the theory to compare it with the experimental data.

While he was right in many ways, my objection to Nikola Tesla's statement is that the mathematical equations in physics still matters especially when you know exactly what each variables in the equation mean.

When they solved general relativity in the weak field approximation, which is the only solution that the mundane, measurable day to day world can be described, they found the Newtonian gravity, dipole gravity and the gravitational quadrupole moment. The Newtonian gravity was expected because any theory of generalized gravity should recover Newtonian gravity in its first approximation. If it doesn't, then the generalized theory of gravity would be wrong. There would be no need to pursue such a theory any further.

And then there was the dipole term which was quickly dismissed because the mathematical term describing the gravitational dipole moment requires the physically meaningful displacement of the center of mass of the object.

The only known displacement of the center of mass in Newtonian mechanics was by the displacement of the origin of the coordinate system. However, this was too trivial if anybody can notice it. Ok, let's put the origin of the coordinate system back to the center of mass of the object and, voila, we don't have to worry about the dipole term anymore. It is gone.

This was how the second order "mathematical term" of general relativity was treated and eliminated in the earlier solution of general relativity. Of course, no doubt Einstein agreed to this conclusion. I emphasized the "mathematical" because I'm here trying to invoke the ghostly specter of the
"mathematics" in direct contrast to Nikola Tesla's early observation.

I noticed the oddity of this interpretation in 1982, when I was a graduate student of U of M, when I heard the news that they (physicists) explained the jets using the magnetic field and the plasma model in the black hole. I could not exactly put my finger in it but I felt it was simply very odd. The model did not sound very elegant, because it didn't give you the satisfaction of the ah ha moment. The other impression was that the black hole should be an intensely gravitational object not an electromagnetic one and the observed length of the jets in both directions seems to be the same, contrary to the electromagnetic theory would predict.

If general relativity had the solution for the jets from the black holes, it should be this dipole term yet it was thrown away so quickly and matter of factedly.



Mathematics !!!!



Why it can't be overlooked.



General relativity was throwing out a puzzle in the linearized theory with the mathematical term called the gravitational dipole moment. What this means is that the truthful math of general relativity had the gravitational dipole moment embedded in its original structure. But the researchers in the field did not know what sense to make out of it. You figure out what this displacement of the center of mass means, but I won't tell you, this was exactly what general relativity was saying.



But how can you find the solution for the puzzle if you don't realize there is even a puzzle? If you accept the explanation by the theorists without critical thinking, how can you suspect there could be something wrong with the widely spread interpretation. However, my physical intuition told me there was something not quite correct in the interpretation of dipole gravity in 1982. If you had solved all the problems at the end of the each chapter of the book of Mechanics by Simon and about 80 percent of the problems in the Jackson's Electrodynamics, you will probably feel the confidence in your intuition on certain subject of physics.



I tend to forget a lot of things. I sometimes search for the keys in my pocket or that I put on a plainly visible table. The more plainly visible place I put it, the harder to find it. I also frequently forget my wife's birthday. But I do not forget the oddities in nature or something that does not follow the expected routine.

Somehow the oddity of the gravitational dipole moment remained in my memory for a long time until I performed a little experiment thirteen years later in 1995 in my mental picture about the center of mass of the rotating hemisphere with special relativity incorporated.

This mental experiment may not mean much to a lot of people. It is purely an exercise of a gedanken experiment. Now in an instant frozen moment of time, the
collectively rotating hemispherical solid object will show the shift of the dynamic center of mass because the dynamic mass increase will be non uniform over the entire volume of the object since a certain part of the object will move faster than other locations and the averaged position of the center of mass will remain skewed because of the longitudinal asymmetry of the object, and also because the center of mass is the averaged location of the object relative to the rest of the universe.

Why this is not normal? Because it violates the first principle of Newtonian mechanics which says that an object without being subjected to the external force will remain at the same position. The rotating hemisphere changes its dynamic center of mass without being pushed in the direction of the shift of the center of mass.

In the terrestrial experiment, this effect will certainly be negligible. The actual shift will be too small to measure. However, if the dimension of the object becomes a massive stellar object, this effect will not be small.

And additionally, this physically measurable quantity makes the gravitational dipole moment meaningful in general relativity and the strength of it depends on the rotating frequency of the source. Voila, we found the magnetic gravity purely from general relativity that describes the rotating objects.

As it came out of the violation of the first principle of the Newtonian mechanics, this isolated gravitational dipole moment has the antigravitational propulsion effect that can set itself in motion in the mass filled universe spontaneously. This is the most astounding revelation in our physical sciences. And this is the consequence of the standard mathematics of general relativity.

Please notice that it was in "MATHEMATICS".

Never underestimate the power of "mathematics" in the "verified" theories of physics.

General relativity and Maxwell's equation are pretty much considered verified theories in physics.

Even if you may overhaul the entire physics of the universe, it will still boil back down to these two fundamental principles of physics in the macroscopic world.

I tend to believe that the secret of the universe can be found from inside the known physical theories by finding out the conflicting anomalies they have among themselves in addition to the way how the symmetry of the nature is broken.

For example, while the mystery of the possible presence of the magnetic monopole is still prevailing among scientists due to the unpleasant out of symmetry between the electric charges and that of the magnets in the Maxwell's equation, how many people see the mysterious and puzzling mass of the neutrinos in the standard electroweak theory has any ramifications to it.

It seems to me the neutrinos are the most ill understood particles in the universe in our physics today, if I'm allowed to make a conjecture on what can be the possible future breakthrough in our knowledge of physics.

No one knows exactly where these neutrinos are despite the staggering number of their existence which is the same as the number of the electrons in the universe. And surprisingly no one seems to be puzzled by it. And not many seem to see the glaring mathematical possibility that the neutrinos can be tachyons.

Again, it is all in mathematics. If we assume that the neutrinos are tachyons, how many mysteries in the universe will be solved instantly !!!!.

The Truth of the Conventional Gravitomagnetism

The Gravity Probe B experiment was conducted supposedly to detect the frame dragging effect "predicted" by general relativity aka by "gravitomagnetism".

However, if you take a look at the theory of gravitomagnetism carefully, you realize that it is "not" in fact general relativity. It is a theory derived from the modified Maxwell's equation to make it look like a gravitational effect. I couldn't believe that the official web pages of Gravity Probe B openly announces that they are testing general relativity.

But the general relativity community has already concluded that the magnet equivalent dipole gravity does not exist in general relativity long time ago. The mathematical term corresponding to dipole gravity exists but it was concluded that the term has no physical meaning. That conclusion is written in the text books of gravity including that of John Wheeler, Kip Thorne and Charles Misner.

Then what is this object called "Gravitomagnetism"? It has the DNA of the Maxwell's equation but it is not exactly the same as the Electromagnetism. In the early days of the development of general relativity, the gravitational physicists desperately needed to find the magnet like gravity from somewhere, but they could not find it inside the general relativity because they have already thrown out the mathematical term that was assigned the name "gravitational dipole moment". So, they created one from a piece here and another piece there by modifying the Maxwell's equation and made up this theory called gravitomagnetism. The assumption that the gravity will be topologically similar to the electromagnetism expressed by Maxwell's equation was a pure conjecture that was not tested at all. Even in the approximation, there was no guarantee that it will be the true depiction of the physical reality. It was obviously not the pure legitimate child of general relativity. It was born out of the Maxwell's equation and then adopted by the general relativity community and since then it went by as a child of general relativity without being contested. This is the birth history of the gravitomagnetism.

I can understand that they didn't know how the center of mass of an object can be shifted without any external force contrary to the Newtonian mechanics. But they know now. I showed it in my two papers listed in my scientific document list. It doesn't take an hour to show how the shift of the center of mass happens in the framework of relativity theory with 100 percent certainty, with the precise mathematical form for the model object.

The irony is that they do not seem to care of this revelation. Somehow it doesn't seem to matter to them. "We know now we have been wrong but who are you to tell us we all have been wrong?" is kind of their attitude.

What kind of arrogance is that?

What is the purpose of testing the atomic fine structure constant in such an accuracy in the first place? The physical science is after all about the accuracy and the precision, isn't it?

Whether it is in the matter of the fine structure constant or in the theoretical conceptual details in gravity, we strive to be accurate.

The dipole gravity effect that comes out of the dynamic shift of the center of mass from the rotating rigid body may look like a tiny, drop in a bucket, effect as it truly looks like one. But, still, that dipole term is the strongest gravity effect next to Newtonian in general relativity. It can not be ignored by any means.

On top of that, that's what science is all about, finding the details to reach the greatest accuracy. We spent close to a billion dollars to investigate the rotational gravity effect with GP-B. Yet they are comparing their data with the modified Maxwell's equation not with the genuine general relativity. It's like comparing an apple with an orange. They simply can not match. And the NASA announced that the GP-B experiment was a flop.

If your experimental result doesn't produce the predicted effect, isn't it time to investigate if the theory was correct in the first place at the same time investigating if there was any error in your experiment? Both activities should go hand in hand.

One may try to argue that, after all, general relativity might not have been correct at all. The so far known solution of general relativity has been wrong on the part of the gravitational dipole moment. However, that is a totally different issue compared to the question of if general relativity was correct at all. General relativity is such a gigantic yet simple framework of the theory of gravity that there is not much to go wrong except the detailed solutions that humans miss in the learning process of the theory. After all, Einstein himself missed it. He didn't know dipole gravity could be a meaningful solution of general relativity.

Someone asked me "Are you greater than Einstein?" to say Einstein missed the solution of dipole gravity that you found in his own theory? I'm a very modest and seclusive person. But if my discovery of dipole gravity can make me greater than Einstein, so be it. It's not my duty to assess my own achievement. It is up to the people in the coming generations in the field of science to decide.

These are the reasons that the GP-B experiment data is crucial to test the reality of dipole gravity as well as general relativity itself. That's why it is so important.

If I were one of them who have conducted the GP-B experiment, I would try to reproduce the so called "electrostatic patch effect" from the earth bound laboratory test to prove their own conjecture regarding the source of the error. If they can not reproduce the same error, the patch effect conjecture can not be right. And this will give their experimental data more credence.

However, if they knew the strength of the dipole gravity was so large, as predicted by dipole gravity, the level of the precision they achieved with their equipment would not have been necessary.

Even the GPS satellite could have been enough to test the dipole gravity effect. The oscillations of the GPS satellites along the equatorial plane of the rotating earth above the ground was already a direct proof of dipole gravity.

What baffled the GP-B experimental team initially was that they detected the unexpectedly large signal that they never expected to observe. Basically, they detected the new force that is topologically and quantitatively different from the one predicted by the theory of the gravitomagnetism which is a direct proof that the gravity has no resemblance to the electromagnetism, defying the widely spread conjecture that the rotational gravity will follow the Maxwellian paradigm.

When they announced that their results matched with the theory of gravitomagnetism within 10 percent or so was after the subtraction of this huge signal, which they regarded as error, from their data. This of course is a total nonsense. The systematic error can not be larger than the signal, which was the reason in the first place that NASA announced the GP-B experiment was a flop.

For a net dipole gravity effect to manifest, not only the rotation but also the longitudinal asymmetry of the rotating body is necessary, the fact of which could not be deduced from the analogy with the Maxwell's equation. In other words, the conventional gravitmagnetism was an unfortunate attempt of the theoretical experiment that did not turn out to be correct.

The fundamental premises of the conventional theory of gravitomagnetism was that like in the case of the Maxwell's equation where the movement of the charge creates the magnetic field, the motion of the mass should create the magnet like gravity, regardless of the geometrical shape of the rotating body, which was a totally failed assumption.

General relativity had its own way of creating the magnet like gravity.

Revisit the Old Question of The Energy of The Electric Field

Suppose there is charge Q on a metallic sphere of radius R and the electric field generated by the charge at the distance r is given by Q/(4*pi*e0*r). Now the question is "where is the energy located due to this charge?". The conventional wisdom generally conveyed in the text books is that the energy is in the entire space of the electric field created by the charge Q.

This misconception has created a huge misunderstanding in the physics of electricity and magnetism. In fact, unless there is a separate electric charge nearby or in the entire space around this source charge Q, there is no EM energy in the space(outside of the conductor) due to this charge Q. Instead, the energy is within the charge Q inside the metallic sphere itself repelling each other as the electrons or the ions exert the force against each other as individual entities.

In the case of the concentric spherical capacitor, the electric field in between the two shells comes only from the charges in the inner sphere. However the energy stored in this concentric configuration comes from the attractive force between this electric field and the charges in the outer sphere. So there is no increase in the strength of the electric field between the shells due to the charges in the outer sphere. It is only the additional electrostatic energy in the entire configuration that springs up.

After all, it requires two spatially separated charges in space to create an electrostatic potential energy. So, if two electrons are spatially separated in space, they will create the electrostatic potential energy.

Now the serious question is if the two electrons can be considered to be in the three dimensional space if they are within the voluminous metal(how small it may be), which is the fundamental question that has never been asked seriously in physics.

Suppose there is a thin straight copper wire of length L.

Now, let's put two electrons in this copper wire. Where will these two electrons be located once they are put inside the conducting wire?

Remember the interior of the metallic conductors are free zone for the electric charges within the physical boundary according to our well established Solid State Physics. There is no restriction of the movement of the charges inside the metal. So, it is natural to expect that the two electrons will tend to be separated as far away from each other as much as possible. So the answer to the question regarding the location of the two electrons will be "far at the end of the wire".

One electron in one end of the wire and the other on the other end of the wire. The electric field created by these two electrons is very complex and the analytic solution will be next to impossible and so is the case with the cylindrical configuration. This is the reason the concentric spherical capacitor becomes such an ideal example to prove the case of the capacitor anomaly.

Now the next question is "Is there any electrostatic potential energy between these two electrons?" Yes there should be.

So the energy of the electric charge Q located inside the metallic sphere is not in the space outside of the metal. The energy is inside the metal in the form of the electrostatic repulsive force.

This sounds like an obvious and mundane statement. But the implication of this statement is in the fact that we can not dismiss the self energy inside the charged capacitors which has been out of the physical reality in our conventional theory of electricity and magnetism for the last 160 years of the human civilization.

Is the Capacitor Anomaly a Case of Zeno's Paradox?

It is possible that some of the physicists who can not dispute the validity of the capacitor anomaly may think that this is just another similar case of Zeno's paradox.

Such an attitude can be summarized by the following. "I can't disprove it, but I know it can't be true" kind of line of justification which can not really be a logical thinking. "But if it is true, it is entirely over my head". Hence, the chain of the rational mind stops working entirely.

This kind of similar situation happens when you discuss the religion of Islam with a Muslim. As soon as you get to the point where you have to seriously challenge the authority of the religious leader of Islam, the discussion ends abruptly because you can not go any further unless he/she has to disavow his/her religion.

What is remarkable about the science is that we have the tool known as mathematics that can prove or disprove a line of a statement on a certain quantitative phenomenon without a shadow of doubt.

For a reminder, Zeno's paradox runs like in the following hypothetical problem.

Zeno's Paradox: The Motionless Runner

A runner wants to run a certain distance - let us say 100 meters - in a finite time. But to reach the 100-meter mark, the runner must first reach the 50-meter mark, and to reach that, the runner must first run 25 meters. But to do that, he or she must first run 12.5 meters.

Since space is infinitely divisible, we can repeat these 'requirements' forever. Thus the runner has to reach an infinite number of 'midpoints' in a finite time. This is impossible, so the runner can never reach his goal. In general, anyone who wants to move from one point to another must meet these requirements, and so motion is impossible, and what we perceive as motion is merely an illusion.

Where does the argument break down? Why?
And also, where is the mathematical proof on this?

Now, let's examine the physical nature of the capacitor anomaly. The physical mechanism of the capacitor anomaly can be explained more clearly by the following physical observation(s).

The force lines that define the conventional energy stored in the concentric spherical capacitor are radial which means they are coming out of the center of the concentric spheres. On the other hand, the force lines that define the repulsive self energy is tangential to the sphere's surface.

This means that the force lines from the attractive electrostatic potential energy and the force lines from the repulsive electrostatic potential energy are "orthogonal" to each other. This indicates that the two types of the energy can not be mixed together.

The proof of the orthogonality between the two independent vector quantities is an excellent mathematical argument on the separate nature of the two seemingly related yet mysterious vector quantities in physics.

One can draw a spherical Gauss plane in between the two concentric spherical shell to calculated the field in between the shells, but then one can also draw a Gauss plane cut across in half of the inner sphere and there will still be net charges inside the Gauss plane which represents the source inside the Gauss plane. This proves that there IS electric field within the conducting metal which was totally neglected in the conventional theory of Electricity and Magnetism.

Of course, this means that the conventionally known energy (1/2)*Q^2/c in the capacitor does not include the repulsive self energy from each of the spherical shells.

Also, I tend to isolate the discussion of the space energy extraction using the gravitational dipole moment as I discussed in my other papers from that of the capacitor anomaly. However, once you add these two phenomena together, the case of the space energy extraction becomes an indisputable scientific fact, making the law of the local energy conservation a serious scientific misidentification.

I like the expression, "INDISCRIMINATE, OVER GENERALIZATION" of a principle obtained from one specific branch of physics (Thermodynamics) to all other more advanced branches of physics (theory of Electricity and Magnetism, General relativity) without serious investigation.

Knowledge of the Garden of Eden. What is Good and What is Evil?

This is a very old philosophical question that has been asked and answered in the book "Republic" written by Plato. In his long deductive argument, it boils down to the following point, "Is it possible for a pure evil to sustain its own existence?".

If the deception, dishonesty and the self sabotage are the characteristics of the evil, how evil itself can stand by its own, because the evil entity will be divided and fight among themselves until the whole system of the evil falls apart. So, ultimately the evil is an unsustainable entity that can not exist by its own and that's why it is evil.

This was the essential core of the Plato's argument. The life of evil, if it can ever exist, is ephemeral. Even for an instant moment of existence, it needs a certain amount of virtue borrowed from the "Goodness". So, in human society, it is possible for evil to sustain a certain amount of time due to the following reasons.

It is the principle of self preservation based on the premises of the LIMITED RESOURCES.

If you examine the movie "God Father" closely, at certain point, you will gasp, after a while imagining how could such an evil entity can stay alive in the first place. However, you realize that the only mode of the justification for their evil activity in that setting is the survival. The survival is the justification for any action within the premises of the whole group. But as you see there are as powerful enemy in their neighborhood threatening their existence, and their life is always in danger. There is no genuine peace in the whole group of the mafia other than the facade of festivity. The movie shows you the picture of the joyous party where women are dancing and children are happy in the surroundings. It is a surreal picture of the gruesome aspect of this type of environment where mafia is freely roaming within the society.

Let's assume that there is a society where people's life is not threatened by the lack of the resources. You don't have to go to the street for begging by being unemployed. The life and death situation by being out of your job is not there. Your minimum and beyond of the resources are provided for free. I'm not dreaming here about the conventional wisdom of the communism.

If the energy resource for every body is infinitely available, what will be the people's obsession toward the next.

There is no justification for deception and self sabotage. People will be able to see through other's evil intent very quickly. Any kind of deception will be caught. Any wrong doings of the people will not be unnoticed. It will be a transparent society. There is very little purpose that the corporation will extort people for the benefit of the profit.

The prevalent mode of the operation of the society in such world will be peace and tranquility and mostly in helping and improving the lives of the fellow human beings.

Most of the petty crimes in this world is from the necessity of the survival which can't really be categorized as crime because every one else in this world is in the same ultimate fight for the survival. The only difference is who is in the side of the political right. So, the political corruption will be rampant in such a society to have an edge over the rest of the competitors. The drug makers will do everything to make sure their drugs will sell regardless of the knowledge that there could be much cheaper and safer alternative medicine in the world. They could go so far as to actively suppress such information because it may danger their pharmaceutical business. The oil company will on the other hand may have vested interest in suppressing the information that may danger their oil and gasoline related enterprise. The only losing party is the consumer at the cost of all of their labors to enrich the big businesses.

How can all these be reversed?

I think the answer is in the development of the tachyonic energy source. And ultimately the revision of our entire physics text books away from the unfit law of energy conservation which was not very well defined in the first place. The reason for this has been explained many times but here it goes again, how the law of the energy conservation can be defined when the container is fundamentally leaky? The air tight plastics, stainless steel and glass are all leaky for the magnetic field as well as for the general electromagnetic fields. Now, in this situation, what is the meaning of the energy conservation? The range of the influence of the electromagnetic field is infinite. So, how do you define the energy conservation? What is the limited volume of this energy to perfectly prove that the energy is conserved? You can't define the infinite volume for the energy container. Therefore, you can not define the energy conservation for the electromagnetic field and its energy content rigorously.

If the electric capacitors can accumulate more energy than the energy needed to charge them, as proved in the physical theory of the tachyonic energy device, why are we struggling with the lack of the energy source?

Why should the US worry about the national debt or that of any nations for that matter? Why anyone has to go sleep cold in the winter of the night? Why anyone should be thirsty for the lack of the clean water? Why the crops should go dry when there is not enough rain. The limitless energy can be used to desalinate the sea water and pump it to irrigate all the farms for free in all the nations of the world.

You can't make the device for free certainly but the energy itself is free just like the air we breath is free. What is the point of all these argument about the off shore drilling, alternative energy, etc?

The energy is free for all of us humans to use for the eons. If there is anything that prevents this from being achieved, I would call it the evilest force in the universe no matter what may be involved in their agenda.

This information has been sent personally to the US energy secretary and the Nobel physics laureate Paul Chu, the disclosure project proponent Steven Greer, the self proclaimed physicist and the project Camelot contributor George Green, the author of the book "The Coming Energy Revolution" Jeane Manning, the fierce whistle blower of the NASA's Cobe Experiment fraud, Bibhas De and my beloved Ph.D physicist friends who can not dispute the physical truth of the capacitor anomaly.

Where are they? And what are their priorities of life in this urgent time of crisis of humanity in the history of mankind?

There is No Energy Crisis in The World

The gulf oil leak crisis may be a good opportunity that the humanity must consider the permanent alternative energy solution seriously. In my published video "Physics of Free Energy Device" in the Youtube, I have shown why there is unlimited energy in the space for us to tap and use freely. The fundamental principle of how to extract this energy is also presented in the video. The problems of the conventionally known alternative energy sources of solar, wind, ethanol, geothermal energy etc are in the fact that they are all limited in one way or another due to their own peculiar mode of the limited energy source.

The tachyonic energy source is unlimited, easy to tap and environmentally clean. I call it the "tachyonic energy" because the particles that carry this energy are tachyons. People have been using the concept of "zero point energy" for a long time. The concept of zero point energy came from the idea of the quantized harmonic oscillator. There is a vibration of the quantum particles in the amount of energy corresponding to the half of the integer of the frequency, E= 1/2 hf. The physical meaning of this is that there is no absolute rest state for the quantum particles. The quantum particles must have the 1/2 hf of energy even at the absolute temperature of -273.15 degree Celsius. Somethings or some particles in the space are making these particles restless.

However, quantum mechanics is fundamentally a probabilistic theory, and as such it does not describe the exact physical mechanism and/or the mode of the presence of such background particles. It is like assuming I know there is energy in the space but I don't know exactly where that is. This doesn't help us to utilize such energy.
While mysterious, this can be explained by using the alternative and more intuitive physical principle, and that is, the vacuum of the space is not exactly a vacuum. The space is full of tachyonic particles called neutrinos. The physical presence of neutrinos has been known in physics for a long time but humanity is still struggling to understand what this particle neutrinos are. In my LLNL archive paper "Neutrinos Must be Tachyons", I explained why that must be the case, in full field theoretical presentation. The physics community still has no consensus on exactly what is the mass of the neutrinos. And without the consensus on their important property, there can be no progress of science on how to use them for our benefit. That is out of the question.

But then why anybody should wait until they make up their mind when the evidence is so overwhelming. You just go ahead to investigate what might be its physical ramifications. The followings are the conclusions that I have come across while investigating the properties of the neutrinos.

The tachyonic neutrinos are the fundamental cause of the quantum mechanical uncertainty, at the same time being the carriers of the light.

Then how can we use the energy of these particles? The secret was hidden in the capacitor anomaly I presented in the video. What the theory of capacitor anomaly says is that there is always more energy than the energy required to charge a capacitor. And the excess energy is hidden in the form of the repulsive electrostatic potential energy which is elusive because it requires a special device and electronic circuit to make its energy to materialize into a useful form.

In fact, numerous inventors in the past have already accomplished this miraculous feat and the records are abundant throughout the web.

One of the philosophical as well as the physical question is how this tachyonic particle's energy can be extracted as such particles are not interacting with the material physical particles at all. On the contrary, according to the Standard Electroweak Theory of the leptons, developed by Abdus Salam, Sheldon Glashow and Steven Weinberg and also E.C.G. Sudarshan, which unified the electromagnetic force with the weak force, the weakly interacting neutrinos are not totally free from the electromagnetic interactions.

The weak and the electromagnetic interactions are coupled to each other which has been proved to be correct within the Standard Model of the Leptons. They are not independent forces. In other words, neutrinos can get caught or delayed in its motion in one way or another by the electrons in the space. In the process of being caught or most likely being delayed, the tachyonic neutrinos can lose its kinetic energy. The important clue here is that the electron can be used as the energy extracting agent because of its property of interacting with the tachyonic neutrinos and also its extremely high mobility.

The fundamental physical reason that the neutrinos can interact with electrons at all may be in the fact that the neutrinos are magnetic monopoles. It is also noted that the tachyonic magnetic monopole neutrinos can be a perfect medium that can transmit the electromagnetic waves through the space. So, the weak interaction seems to be a secondary result coming from the magnetic property of the neutrinos.

There are many theoretical reasons that this can be the case which will have to be proven in the future. For example, one of the reasons for the possibility in favor of the magnetic monopole tachyonic neutrinos is in the incompleteness of the symmetry in the theory of electromagnetism. The missing magnetic monopoles in the theory of electromagnetism has been a fundamental mystery from the aesthetic physical point of view.

What happens in the process of charging the capacitor is that the clumped electrons allow the tachyonic neutrinos to spend more time before finally released to the space thereby the capacitor accumulates more energy than was required to charge the capacitor initially. So, there is a temporary excess tension built up inside the capacitor which is basically the same energy coming from the repulsive electrostatic force among the same charges regardless of if they are electrons or positive ions.

When the capacitor is suddenly discharged through the space separated by two conductors but not through a resistive wire, this temporary tachyonic energy is "FROZEN" in the form of the kinetic energy of the electrons, at the same time the neutrinos lose their kinetic energy and go back to the space, where precisely the space energy extraction is materialized in reality.

The tachyonic particles have the opposite physical property of the material particles. They travel faster when they lose energy. The slowest neutrinos travel very close to the speed of light and their energy will be very large.

It is natural to conjecture that the preferable state of the tachyonic neutrinos may be by becoming the particles of infinite speed, on the other hand, the preferable state of the material particles is being at rest, after losing all of its kinetic energy, because the last part of this statement has already been known to be the truth.